OK … so I’ve been reading up a couple of early reviews about this week’s release of Watchmen. Now as I’ve noted on this site I’ve only recently read the original work … and clearly I haven’t seen the movie yet … but there’s something which is bugging the hell outta me about these early reviews … and it’s not the first time something like this has bothered me either …
As I’ve already stated, I obviously haven’t seen the movie yet. Therefore I cannot possibly know 100% about what is or is not in the movie and how true it is to the original source material. But … when I’m reading some of these early reviews … from places like the LA Times, Variety or the New Yorker … these reviewers mention things which are SO far off from the actual plot points that I KNOW that there is no way the film could have veered THAT far off course.
What this ends up doing of course is reducing the validity of these reviews to almost nill for me. If these reviewers aren’t able to get a detail correct such as the name of the super hero group … calling them the Masks instead of, duh, the Watchmen … then how am I supposed to take their review of the actual substance seriously?
So what am I left with? A bunch of jerks who seem to obsess over the fact that we see Dr. Manhattan’s junk instead of actually trying to get the facts straight about the movie and delivering an ACCURATE review.